HomeNewsSecret SEC Memo Casts Doubt on XRP's Security Status Amid Ripple Legal...

Secret SEC Memo Casts Doubt on XRP’s Security Status Amid Ripple Legal Battle

- Advertisement -
  • An undisclosed SEC memo has cast doubts on the agency’s initial stance concerning XRP’s status, adding a new layer of complexity to Ripple’s ongoing legal tussle.
  • The memo did not outright classify XRP as a non-security but refrained from recommending enforcement, prompting questions about the SEC’s current allegations against Ripple.

The Memo That Shook the Courtroom

In an unfolding drama that reads like a legal thriller, an undisclosed memo from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has entered the spotlight, unsettling the agency’s heretofore clear-cut stance on the classification of Ripple’s XRP as a security.

The Intricacies of XRP’s Classification

For the uninitiated, the classification of XRP as a security or a non-security is a linchpin in Ripple’s ongoing legal dispute with the SEC. Traditional financial instruments like stocks and bonds are typically considered securities and thus fall under SEC regulations. Cryptocurrencies, however, occupy a nebulous zone, and their classification is subject to intense debate. A financial asset’s designation as a security implicates a stringent set of legal obligations and restrictions, which is why this memo is of seismic importance in this high-profile case.

- Advertisement -

Legal commentator John Deaton, in his discerning analysis, clarified that the memo did not explicitly state that XRP is not a security. Rather, it indicated a lack of enforcement recommendations, which can be deduced as the SEC’s initial reluctance to brand XRP as a security. This subtext can be instrumental in challenging the SEC’s current allegations against Ripple and its executives, Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen, for selling XRP as an unregistered security.

Raising Questions on Ripple’s Alleged Misconduct

Deaton goes on to extrapolate that if the SEC itself harbored uncertainties regarding XRP’s status back in 2018, the agency’s current accusations against Ripple’s leaders for recklessly selling XRP seem, at best, to stand on shaky grounds. The memo’s details remain undisclosed, but its existence throws a wrench into the SEC’s prosecution strategy by challenging the consistency of the agency’s stance over time.

- Advertisement -

While the legal skirmish between Ripple and the SEC continues to unravel, this undisclosed document adds an intriguing, albeit confounding, element to the discourse surrounding XRP’s classification and Ripple’s supposed regulatory transgressions.

Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone:

  • Invest in Ripple (XRP) and 70+ cryptocurrencies and 3,000 other assets.
  • 0% commission on stocks – buy in bulk or just a fraction from as little as $10.
  • Copy top-performing traders in real time, automatically.
  • Regulated by financial authorities including FAC and FINRA.

2.8 Million Users

Get Started


- Advertisement -
ETHNews does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to cryptocurrencies. ETHNews is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.
Collin Brown
Collin Brown
Collin is a Bitcoin investor of the early hour and a long-time trader in the crypto and forex market. He's fascinated by the complex possibilities of blockchain technology and tries to make matter accessible to everyone. His reports focus on developments about the technology for different cryptocurrencies.
- Advertisment -spot_img