HomeNewsRipple's Appeal: Did SEC Just Hand Over an Advantage? XRP News

Ripple’s Appeal: Did SEC Just Hand Over an Advantage? XRP News

- Advertisement -
  • The SEC’s interlocutory appeal against Ripple may have overlooked Judge Torres’ key ruling, says expert attorney Greg Beuke.
  • Beuke challenges the strength of the SEC’s case, emphasizing their reliance on insufficient evidence.

Navigating the Complexities: SEC’s Ripple Case Appeal

In the ever-evolving cryptosphere, few cases have garnered as much attention as the ongoing SEC-Ripple legal skirmish. The latest development—a recent interlocutory appeal by the SEC—has blockchain aficionados and legal experts scratching their heads.

Dissecting the SEC’s Apparent Oversight

In reaction to the SEC’s motion to certify an interlocutory appeal, attorney and crypto enthusiast Greg Beuke sheds light on the potential miscalculations of the regulatory body. According to Beuke, the SEC has seemingly missed the core of Judge Analisa Torres’ ruling.

- Advertisement -

While many have interpreted Torres’ judgment as implying that programmatic sales of digital assets cannot be deemed as investment contracts, Beuke offers a nuanced perspective. He clarifies that Judge Torres’ stance was more specific: in the Ripple context, programmatic sales didn’t equate to investment contracts. This was largely due to the SEC’s inability to demonstrate that XRP investors purchased the digital asset, anticipating profits derived from Ripple’s endeavors.

Beuke further elaborates on the SEC’s flawed evidence strategy. Rather than presenting compelling testimonials from XRP stakeholders who expected gains from Ripple’s operations, the SEC leaned heavily on selectively chosen statements from Ripple and a handful of its employees. For Beuke, this approach fails to meet the stringent evidentiary requirements.

>> Buy XRP quickly and securely with PayPal, credit card or bank transfer at eToro with low fees and deposit protection. Get started with XRP now. Visit Website <<

- Advertisement -

Diving deeper into the strategic implications of the interlocutory appeal, Beuke identifies it as a potentially significant misstep for the SEC. Typically, when an appeal is made post-final judgment, interpretations can be molded to reinforce the appealing party’s stance. But, with an interlocutory appeal—where judgments aren’t final—Judge Torres possesses the latitude to elucidate her ruling. This could undermine the SEC’s position, as Beuke speculates that Torres will underscore the SEC’s evidence shortcomings.

A Glimpse Into the Appeal’s Possible Outcome

Moving forward, Beuke highlights the rigid parameters of appellate proceedings: the SEC can neither introduce new evidence nor craft fresh arguments. With the 2nd circuit confined to existing records, Beuke casts doubt on the robustness of the SEC’s position. While the appellate court may be sympathetic to the SEC’s foundational argument, Beuke believes its ultimate deliberations will be anchored in Judge Torres’ original verdict. This judgment was grounded in an “indisputable factual record,” showcasing the SEC’s failure to substantiate its claims.

Echoing the sentiment of many within the crypto community, Beuke hints at a likely SEC setback in the appeal. He underscores the regulator’s obligation to illustrate that typical XRP retail purchasers recognized and depended on Ripple for prospective gains—an obligation seemingly unmet by the SEC. This perspective gains additional traction with the evident support for Ripple, especially given the uncountered testimonials from XRP stakeholders, championed by renowned attorney John Deaton.

Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone:

  • Invest in Ripple (XRP) and 70+ cryptocurrencies and 3,000 other assets.
  • 0% commission on stocks – buy in bulk or just a fraction from as little as $10.
  • Copy top-performing traders in real time, automatically.
  • Regulated by financial authorities including FAC and FINRA.

2.8 Million Users

Get Started


- Advertisement -
ETHNews does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to cryptocurrencies. ETHNews is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.
- Advertisment -spot_img