New chart from Fidelity Investments raises a key question for Bitcoin markets: could the traditional four-year cycle be coming to an end?
By mapping Bitcoin’s price action from 2011 through projections into 2025–2026, the visual highlights how historical bull and bear markets have followed a familiar rhythm, one that now appears less defined.
Clear Cycles Defined Bitcoin’s Early History
In the earlier years shown on the chart, Bitcoin followed a relatively consistent pattern. Strong bull markets (highlighted in green) were followed by deep bear markets (shown in red), with peaks and troughs forming roughly every four years. These cycles were clearly separated, with sharp drawdowns resetting price before the next expansion phase began.

The chart explicitly marks:
- Bull market tops to bull market tops
- Bear market lows to bear market lows
This structure reinforced the idea that Bitcoin’s price behavior was cyclical and predictable over long timeframes.
Recent Price Action Breaks the Pattern
In the most recent segment of the chart, covering 2022 onward, that structure becomes less clear. Instead of a deep, extended bear market similar to previous cycles, Bitcoin shows a shallower decline followed by a faster recovery. The green bull market zone resumes more quickly, while the red bear market zone is shorter and less severe than in past cycles.
This shift suggests that Bitcoin may no longer be resetting as aggressively as it once did, potentially weakening the traditional four-year framework.
A Potential Shift Toward a Supercycle
The right side of the chart introduces uncertainty, marked with a question symbol beyond 2025. Rather than clearly transitioning into another full bear market, Bitcoin’s price appears to trend upward within a broader range. This visual supports the idea that Bitcoin could be entering a longer-duration growth phase, sometimes described as a supercycle.
Fidelity references historical commodity supercycles, which lasted nearly a decade, as a comparison point. The implication is that Bitcoin’s market behavior may now be driven by longer-term structural forces rather than strict halving-driven cycles.
An Open Question, Not a Conclusion
The chart does not declare the four-year cycle definitively over. Instead, it presents a visual evolution: clear cycles in the past, ambiguity in the present, and uncertainty ahead. Fidelity also emphasizes that past performance is no guarantee of future results, underscoring that this interpretation remains a hypothesis rather than a forecast.
Based solely on the chart, the takeaway is clear: Bitcoin’s historical cycle structure appears to be weakening, and the market may be transitioning into a new phase where long-term trends matter more than rigid four-year timing.






