Transaction activity across Ethereum and its layer-2 networks has continued climbing regardless of where the price of ETH sits, with the combined ecosystem approaching 1.1 billion monthly transactions.
The data, tracked by blockchain analytics platform growthepie, draws a clear line between market sentiment and actual network usage, and the two are currently moving in opposite directions.
According to recent transaction count dashboard, which filters out system transactions and counts only those executed by users or smart contracts, Base leads all networks with 316 million transactions in the last 30 days, up 43% year over year.
Polygon PoS recorded 264 million transactions, representing the strongest annual growth rate among the major networks at 161%. Arbitrum One processed 109 million transactions, up 88% year over year. Ethereum’s mainnet contributed 62 million transactions, growing 64% annually despite remaining the most expensive layer to transact on. The trajectory visible in the growthepie chart tells the broader story: combined ecosystem volume was effectively flat near zero relative to today’s figures as recently as late 2022, and the acceleration since then has been steep and consistent.
The Layer-2 Ecosystem Is Doing the Heavy Lifting
The mainnet figure of 62 million transactions is the smallest among the major networks, which is precisely the outcome Ethereum’s scaling roadmap was designed to produce. Layer-2 networks exist to absorb transaction volume that would otherwise congest and price out users on the base layer, and the data from growthepie shows that design working as intended. Base alone processes more than five times the transaction count of Ethereum mainnet, and the combined L2 volume across the tracked networks dwarfs the L1 contribution by a wide margin.
What makes the year-over-year comparisons meaningful is that they span a period of significant price weakness for ETH, which is trading around $2,000 at the time of writing.
The asset has traded well below its all-time highs throughout much of the measurement window, yet none of the major networks show annual transaction declines. OP Mainnet grew 138% year over year. World Chain is up 109%. Unichain, a newer entrant, shows 298% annual growth off a smaller base. Ink recorded 267%. The usage trend across the ecosystem is broad-based, not concentrated in one or two outliers.
What the Numbers Do and Do Not Show
Transaction count is a useful but incomplete measure of network health. A high transaction count does not distinguish between high-value activity and low-value or automated interactions. Smart contract executions initiated by bots, arbitrage systems, or automated protocols all count toward the total alongside genuine user-driven activity. growthepie’s methodology excludes system transactions, which removes the most obvious sources of artificial inflation, but the remaining figures still reflect a mix of human and programmatic usage that raw counts cannot separate.
The short-term data adds some nuance to the year-over-year picture. Base’s 30-day figure is up just 1.5% from one month ago, suggesting recent growth has flattened at the monthly level even as the annual comparison remains strong. Ethereum mainnet is down 12% over the past 30 days, and OP Mainnet fell 7.6% in the same window. Arbitrum grew 18% month over month, and Polygon added 43% in the last 30 days, indicating that near-term momentum is unevenly distributed across networks.
The Divergence Between Price and Usage
The observation that price is down while activity is not is straightforward to state and harder to interpret. Sustained transaction growth during a bear market phase is generally read as evidence that adoption is maturing beyond speculation, with users and developers continuing to build and transact independent of token price incentives. The alternative reading is more cautious: high transaction counts during low-price environments can also reflect the fact that cheap fees make low-value or experimental activity economically viable in ways that would not survive a fee spike.
What growthepie’s data cannot resolve is which dynamic is dominant. The 1.1 billion monthly transaction figure is a real milestone for the ecosystem. Whether it reflects the kind of durable, high-utility usage that compounds into long-term network value, or partly reflects fee-driven volume that would contract if costs rose, is a question the data alone does not answer.
