- BitVM wasn’t conceived to transform Bitcoin into an Ethereum look-alike.
- Building a decentralized exchange on Bitcoin might be counterintuitive, opines Bitcoin developer Super Testnet.
BitVM’s True Design Philosophy
As the blockchain ecosystem grows, the intent and vision behind each new development becomes crucial for understanding its place in the broader landscape. One such topic of interest in recent times has been BitVM. Rumblings in the community suggested it was Bitcoin’s answer to Ethereum, but Bitcoin developer Super Testnet offers clarity on its real purpose.
lightning already does that. this is just another defi on bitcoin attempt.
— thel0wner.crypto (@TheL0wner) October 12, 2023
Why Not a Bitcoin-Ethereum Hybrid?
Super Testnet, an influential figure in the Bitcoin development community, sheds light on a growing misconception. He emphasizes that the primary objective behind BitVM’s creation was not to metamorphose Bitcoin into a quasi-Ethereum entity. Such a move, according to him, would not only blur Bitcoin’s original essence but could also introduce complications in its established ecosystem.
One significant example he cites is the notion of constructing a decentralized exchange (often abbreviated as DEX) atop Bitcoin‘s structure. On the surface, given the thriving nature of decentralized exchanges in the Ethereum realm, this might seem like a logical progression. However, Super Testnet views it differently.
He argues that grafting a DEX onto Bitcoin would be regressive. The underlying intricacies of Bitcoin’s architecture, combined with its historical use-case and design philosophy, might make the integration of a DEX more challenging and potentially less efficient than on platforms specifically tailored for such operations, like Ethereum.
While Bitcoin and Ethereum both fall under the umbrella of cryptocurrencies, they are inherently distinct. Ethereum’s platform was crafted with a broader focus on facilitating decentralized applications (DApps) and smart contracts. Bitcoin, on the other hand, was primarily designed as a decentralized digital currency. Merging functionalities could risk compromising the robustness of either system.
In the ever-evolving world of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, innovation is celebrated. Yet, it’s crucial to understand the foundational principles of each platform and respect their individual strengths. BitVM, as Super Testnet highlights, has its unique role in the Bitcoin realm, and any misalignment with Ethereum’s functionalities was never part of its blueprint.