HomeNewsBitcoin's Thirst: Crypto Mining Outpaces New York City in Water Consumption

Bitcoin’s Thirst: Crypto Mining Outpaces New York City in Water Consumption

- Advertisement -
  • Surpassing NYC’s Water Use: Bitcoin mining’s estimated annual water consumption globally has exceeded New York City’s, raising environmental concerns.
  • Debate Over Methodology: The methodology used to estimate Bitcoin’s water footprint has sparked debate, with critics questioning the accuracy and implications of these findings.

The Water Consumption of Bitcoin Mining

A startling revelation from the journal Cell Reports Sustainability has placed Bitcoin mining’s global water consumption in the spotlight. According to a report cited by The Wall Street Journal, Bitcoin miners are expected to use over 591 billion gallons of water annually, surpassing the 403 billion gallons consumed by New York City in 2022, as per the U.S. Geological Survey data.

Primary Sources of Water Usage

The significant water usage in Bitcoin mining primarily stems from the cooling needs of its computer servers. This necessity arises both directly for the servers themselves and indirectly through the air conditioning systems of gas- and coal-fired power plants that support the mining operations.

Environmental Implications and Debates

Bitcoin’s operations, known for their intensive use of electricity, now face scrutiny for their substantial water consumption. The digital currency’s large data centers demand considerable resources, including water, for efficient functioning.

Criticism and Counterarguments

Environmental organizations and critics have expressed concerns about the sustainability of Bitcoin mining, questioning whether its benefits justify such extensive resource consumption. The report’s methodology, however, has become a point of contention. Critics like Stephen Diehl view Bitcoin as an environmentally detrimental technology, while proponents such as Daniel Batten challenge the accuracy of these claims.

Batten argues that the methodology used to estimate Bitcoin‘s water usage is flawed. He emphasizes the need for a more nuanced understanding of resource consumption, particularly in the context of renewable resources like water. He critiques the indirect measurement of water use through electricity consumption, suggesting that it does not accurately reflect Bitcoin’s actual water footprint. Furthermore, Batten criticizes the approach of correlating unrelated variables to draw exaggerated conclusions about Bitcoin‘s environmental impact.


The report on Bitcoin mining surpassing New York City’s annual water usage has ignited a debate over the digital currency’s environmental footprint. The controversy highlights the complexities of assessing the sustainability of emerging technologies and calls for a more refined approach to evaluating their resource consumption.

Disclaimer: ETHNews does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to cryptocurrencies. ETHNews is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.
AnnJoy Makena
AnnJoy Makenahttps://www.ethnews.com
Annjoy Makena is an accomplished and passionate writer who specializes in the fascinating world of cryptocurrencies. With a profound understanding of blockchain technology and its implications, she is dedicated to demystifying complex concepts and delivering valuable insights to her readers. Business Email: info@ethnews.com Phone: +49 160 92211628